Comments on: Column: Immaculate Projection? Sure, why not?

By: DJ

DJ — Wed, 22 Oct 2014 04:20:19 +0000

I think O’Brien’s a jerk as well.
.
Will check back in one year.

By: DJ

DJ — Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:46:09 +0000

Loved him since Day 1. Qualities seen then were great body lean/yards after contact, great vision/nimble feet so elusive, patience in setting up blocks, and fantastic hands.
.
Comment at time (Trib blog) was: What’s not to like? Forgetting if anyone responded.

By: Brian Robinson

Brian Robinson — Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:40:39 +0000

This win was a big confidence builder and it doesn’t matter how we won. Sunday we play a much better team and the secondary will have to play its best game of the season. I really hope they don’t start Cortez Allen. He’s toast. Give someone else a chance. It wouldn’t hurt.

By: Brian Robinson

Brian Robinson — Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:14:38 +0000

I agree. Plain and simple. Cortez is either high or just ain’t that good. I prefer to believe he’s no good. Maybe they should make him watch video of Primetime or Rod Woodson. What is it with these db’s? There’s more to just running with the receiver. TURN AND LOOK FOR THE BALL!!

By: Pumba

Pumba — Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:12:02 +0000

It was fun seeing the family Scott in Orlando. You may have been the good luck charm that MT needed

By: Bridge

Bridge — Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:00:12 +0000

Those is jokes. Obviously, DK made it very clear that Timmons drank too much water. Obviously.

By: Rocco

Rocco — Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:07:29 +0000

Even the atrocious 5-11 Steelers of 1988 beat a 10 win team. I got to see more.

By: Jim S.

Jim S. — Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:24:26 +0000

Maybe I got sucked in by Tirico saying the close-up indicated he had landed out. You’re right, though. A chunk of turf, half in and half out, doesn’t mean he landed out. More likely, he dragged it across the line.

By: Arriba Wilver

Arriba Wilver — Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:16:04 +0000

Don’t know, but it looked to me like that actually supported the TD unless these guys never took physics and think when he landed he didn’t continue going forward. And the “line” was barely touched based on the turf “evidence.”

By: Jim S.

Jim S. — Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:05:23 +0000

Even though they are not supposed to consider them, I wonder if the close-up pictures ESPN showed of the turf that indicated he may have landed on the line swayed the booth.