Kyle Okposo goes hard forehand to beat Marc-Andre Fleury for the winning shootout goal. — GETTY IMAGES
DEJAN KOVACEVIC, DK ON PITTSBURGH SPORTS
Apologies in advance, but this deserves all kinds of disclaimers before the first significant sentence:
• The Penguins’ 5-4 shootout loss to the Islanders on Saturday night was one game of 82. It was no big deal from the season scope nor even this singular outcome. It came down to the final, decisive strike by New York’s Kyle Okposo. Could have been anyone. Could have gone either way.
• The Islanders are as skilled, as creative offensively as any team in the NHL. If you don’t think so, power up that DVR and take a harder look. They’re legit.
• Mike Johnston has been nothing less than a godsend.
And I can’t stress that last one emphatically enough. Jim Rutherford couldn’t have fared any better in finding the right man with the right plan for this group.
But — and yeah, I’m finally getting to that first sentence — Johnston just failed his own first exam.
Not by my definition. By his own.
These were his words earlier in the week regarding this home-and-home that continues Saturday night in Uniondale: “You have a chance to prepare for a team, play a game and react to how you’ve played and what you need to do the next day. You know they’re going to react, and they’re going to adjust their game plan. I look forward to these two-game series that we have because it does give us a chance in the busy schedule that we have to see simulate playoff action.”
Well, wonderful.
The Penguins under Dan Bylsma treated the regular season as if mattered, which, for a team blessed with so much talent, it didn’t. They could coast from October to April and still finish among the East’s top eight. As a result, they’d foolishly convince themselves that having one get-to-our-game system was plenty and that their way could trump any counter-strategy.
Johnston is to be commended for stating and behaving, from his opening drills of camp, as if the regular season only matters as a launching pad for the one that follows.
So, why oh why, would he have picked this game to unleash his inner Bylsma?
No, really, how else to explain his worst move coming hours before faceoff with the inexplicable healthy scratching of Simon Despres?
He’d been one of the Penguins’ most dynamic defensemen through the first 17 games, and one of those unmistakably was a bullish showing in the 4-0 shutout Tuesday in Montreal. He was aggressive on the attack, smart with the puck, physical and sharp in his end.
He didn’t deserve a benching. He deserved a boost in ice time.
He didn’t deserve a blow to his confidence. He deserved assurance that, just because the coaching staff wanted Robert Bortuzzo involved, it wouldn’t come — as it almost always did under Bylsma — at his expense.
I asked Johnston about his decision, in precisely that context, right after this game:
Some might find that answer acceptable. Sorry, I don’t. Johnston’s first order of business today is seeking out Despres, attempting to explain what happened, then letting him know with a pat on the shoulder that he’ll be back in the lineup Saturday and for the foreseeable future. If Johnston was serious when talking about learning from his mistakes, he’ll correct this one immediately.
I don’t want to read too much into body language, but the sagging Despres I saw walking out of the Penguins’ room late Friday night sure looked like a guy who could use that.
Once Johnston mends that fence, he can get about doing some DVR duty himself and, from there, admitting that his New York counterpart, Jack Capuano, handed his hat to him.
The Islanders came out hard, much more emotionally invested, much more ready to pounce.
“If there’s one thing we could change, it’s how we started,” Marc-Andre Fleury said, hardly omitting himself after a first period in which the Islanders put three of their first eight shots behind him, including an unscreened wrister by fourth-liner Matt Martin that originated somewhere in Swissvale. “They were really flying, and it took us a while to match that.”
That’s no big deal for mid-November. But to remind, it was Johnston who hoped to use this as a playoff barometer of sorts. That message apparently never resonated, if it was even received.
Next, Johnston can ask what in the name of all that is sane he was thinking to pair Bortuzzo and Rob Scuderi, his two slowest defensemen, against a group of forwards that is the NHL’s fastest withoutMichael Grabner, the league’s fastest skater currently to injury. If Grabner had shared ice with that duo, he’d have looked like one of those 99-rated skaters in EA video games.
Next, Johnston can ask how a system predicated on putting pucks to the net only did so twice in the game’s opening 15 minutes, even though the Islanders’ backup goaltender, Chad Johnson, couldn’t control rebounds in the slightest.
I asked Johnston about that, too: “We passed up some shooting opportunities to try to make plays. We weren’t doing enough, especially early on.”
Hm. At least one of the Penguins’ players afterward intimated that part of the plan was controlling the puck — not shooting it — to wear down New York’s defensemen and suppress their attack. If that was, in fact, vocalized, it wouldn’t be the kind of adjustment any team would want to make. Shots are your friend. Always.
Finally, and this is a little thing by comparison, but Johnston balked when asked how he felt about the Penguins having no power plays in a game that was plenty chippy at times: “That was a well-reffed game. I didn’t think there were any penalties that deserved to be called.”
One must assume, then, that he took no exception to the vicious, dangerous leg-on-leg hit by the Islanders’ Johnny Boychuk on Evgeni Malkin, one that felled Malkin for roughly 90 seconds. Malkin was lucky to return, and Boychuk would be lucky to avoid a suspension and/or fine if this weren’t the NHL we were discussing. Especially if anyone is familiar with a bit of history between Boychuk and Malkin.
Do what no one at the league will do, and watch this hit for yourself:
Never mind how a ref misses that. How does a head coach miss that?
You’d better believe that working the refs, during and after a game, are part of the playoffs.
So, class, what’s been learned?
First, to repeat, the Islanders are legit. Just ask Fleury:
Second lesson: It’s better to fail the midterm than the final. That’s tonight.
Should have never benched Despres especially against Islanders! I totally agree with you, Dejan, Simon has been the best all-around defenseman. I thought Byslma showed up for the pregame lineup.
If it is preparing for the playoffs what's the hurt to see what this pairing would do and if it would perform as bad as it did today? Not saying it was the correct choice, but we learned we couldn't get away with that pairing in the playoffs
To be fair, he did separate 41 and 4 at a few points in the game. Seemed like he at least recognized it wasn't working. The real problem is that Scuds is still on the roster. He's been putting Despres in tough situations all year and fortunately, Despres has still played well.
I am a big Despres supporter and always have been so I would generally agree.....one question....do you think given the nature of the rivalry, and the amount of time/success Scuds seems to bring to the PK, with Duper already gone, MJ was afraid to subtract Scuds too?
Me & You & A Dog Named Blue,
.
Well, it's the same old song; but in a different key since you've been gone.
.
Rob Scuderi has actually been good this year.
It's not just managing talent, but also understanding the person. Despres has made great strides on the ice - Johnston needs to also manage the person to ensure progress continues. And Despres didn't act unprofessionally. Unprofessional was Boychuk's run on Malkin
Funny thing but was thinking same thing about why HCMJ did not scratch Scuds or Ehrhoff.
.
Vets with big contracts and HCMJ believing it would be blow to egos and too hard for THEM to accept. So he sits the young kid instead.
.
BOTH have been outplayed by Depres.
New coach sets bad precedent when not rewarding performance on ice. Period. Clearly he was uncomfortable with the question. As he should have been.
.
That said, he's a bright guy and HE'S learning at NHL level as well. Here's hoping he doesn't make same mistake again.
Very disappointed with Johnston tonight. Especially his response to taking Despres out. If anything I would have given Scuds the night off. Not based on play, but age and a need to keep him fresh to continue playing well. Besides Despres has been one of the best on the ice and the most physical. Hopefully remedied tomorrow night
Wasn't it Downie who caught Boychuk knee on knee a couple minutes before the Johnny-Geno hit? I had a two year old crawling all over me, but I thought that was the sequence?
I really question if the D-Man currently ranked 7th in TOI, getting the most favorable zone starts, is actually that pivotal. Despres and Scuderi pairing has played fine, but it is sheltered minutes, and Despres sits 2nd in the league in PDO, that isn't a skill.
That's because he is paired with Scuderi. You know, the guy who is Pittsburghs worst D man. I love you guys who just throw out these stats and can't actually decipher what real talent is by watching the games. Despres should have been playing!!
It is easier to play well when you start in O-Zone against weaker competition than being asked to dig out of your own zone against top lines. Despres is playing fine, and considering Scuderi puts him in some bad spots at times, but he is only been out there 14 mins/night.
I may be mis-remembering, but Downie checked Boychuk in an odd fashion prior to Boychuk hitting Malkin. When Downie is out just trying to hit people it can lead to retaliatory runs at the Pen's skaters. He can be a solid player on the 3rd line, he should stick to doing that.
Thanks, maybe the Downie hit had nothing to do with Boychuk's action then. Nice to see Shawn Thornton restoring order and making sure everyone knows the code, in that clip, what a league.
Thank you for asking about Despres. I couldn't believe my eyes when I didn't see him on the ice the first few shifts of the game. Why after one of the best D performances in quite some time would you change the D. Hopefully Simon reads your column and the comments below!
How Boychuk is going to walk away with no repercussions for that hit on Malkin is beyond me. That's ridiculously dirty and dangerous. Should be a suspension.
I think I'm going to side with Johnston on this one. The Pens are a league-best 8-1-1 over the last 10 games. I think that giving up 3 goals in 95 seconds is pretty inexcusable no matter who is on the ice, and that lapse was the primary reason the Pens didn't win in regulation.
That being said, I feel that Saturday's game on Long Island will be a better measuring stick. Yes, Despres will probably be back. But the Pens would be better served with Bortuzzo in the line-up in NY.
But it's a long season and every now and then... well... you just lose.
Correct DK, bad pairing with Birts. scuderi is just not good enough in a game of speed and jump on you checking. But Ray left them a great parting gift in that contract so MJ has to make the best of it. Sit him tonight. Pens needs are obvious. top 6 winger and a RH defensemen .
Yes I also believe scratching Despres was a mistake. Having said that...MJ has been a breath of fresh air so far this season. He has to learn and get better throughout the season just like the players. MJ understands the regular season is an audition...I trust come playoff time the kinks will be worked out
I like Despres but do not believe his absence was as significant as represented in the article. The flatness of the Pens put them into the unenviable position of coming from behind, along with the minimization of power-plays has also altered their offensive prowess. 29 off night
Pens forgot all they'd been drilled and revered to bylsmagic hockey. MAF had a forgettable night. Refs were in playoff mode, letting tripping, interference, slashing, etc, go all night. Also the lines need redone. PH should go back w/Sid that works for PH's net front game.
DK, I love finally seeing a "shop" button on your site where we can acquire some DKonPittsburghSports.com apparel. Santa thanks you as this has eased the frustrations of shopping for the season. :)
Its November folks, these games don't really matter much. The teams problems are in May not now. Bortuzzo needed to play why not rest Despres? Tonight someone else will sit and o it will go. This game and tonight's game are not a test at all just another November game.
Per Errey, Malkin likes the RH sniper. It's not PH despite him scoring. Move BB up and Comeau down so it's Sid/PH/Kunitz, Comeau/BB/Malkin, Downie/Sutter/Spaling or Megna, Goc/Spaling or Megna/Adams or Sill. Move a D assets (Dumolin, Hoff, PM) for a young NHL ready forward.
With career totals of 7 goals and 63 shots in 52 games Bennett isn't just 'not a sniper,' but he's nothing close to the top four winger this team needs.
BB has a great shot, or maybe you missed that snipe on Cary Price at Mont. Maybe playing with offensively challenged guys like Adams on the 4th line contributed to his low goal totals, ya think?
Regarding the Malkin/Boychuk incident. Could it be that Johnston was trying to send a message to his team that sometimes especially in the playoffs you cant let this kind of stuff agitate you to the point that you moan and whine and take your focus off of just playing through it
One of the items in the story about passing up shots in favor of controlling the puck to tire out the D-men really stood out for me. When I saw in the box score that Crosby had zero shots on goal that drove home the point. Can't score if you don't shoot!
To your point Leess, the Pens only had one shot on goal through at least the first 12 minutes of the first period. This issue seems to be more disconcerting than the personnel on the ice. As you said, "you can't score if you don't shoot", they seem to look for the perfect play.
Pretty damn funny! Boychuck asks Malkin if he is ok. If that ain't taunting after trying to make it so Geno would have no juniors. Hahahaha Johnny, real funny. Three "knees" to aim at, and my opinion it was the middle one. Best game in years by a Penguin team after multiple days off. Good work HCMJ.
i wouldnt look too much into this. trying to see who works with who. we know now that we can come back . really slow to starta . isles have great speed and can catch you off guard. we had a lot of bad chnges . simone shouldbhave played but not mad they didnt start him. scuds needs to play 60games not72
: “You have a chance to prepare for a team, play a game and react to how you’ve played and what you need to do the next day."
Ain't failed yet DK, hard part of the "test" comes tonight.
I like Borts as a physical defenseman paired with Maata but he was really bad last nite, a ton of turnovers in the defensive zone and took a few chances that led to some scoring chances the other way, don't mind that if he has Maata there to erase that but Scuds isn't going to be able to move that well. Hope it was just a one night experiment.
Not dismissing these 2 games as unimportant. Tavares and Okposo bit of off nights and now get to see Halak, ingredient missing from Isles in prior years.
.
Eastern Conference team that would least like to meet in playoffs.
Good column. Great points. All well explained. It's a November loss and since the Pens have proven that home ice means next nothing to them in the playoffs, I won't get too excited about losing out on a point last night.
Spot as always Dejan - knew there was trouble when read about Simon scratch before the game. Will be interesting to see what lessons were learned and what counter-measures will be applied tonight. This is an early but significant view into how their Spring fortunes might play out.
Megna was recalled from the AHL. Hopefully this means no more Sill, if a guy is skating 5 mins/game he isn't providing anything. I think this move was only made possible when Dupuis moved to LTIR.
If Simon Despres' reaction to getting a 1 game scratch is to pout, then I don't care how good of a player he is, he needs to go. Pros do whatever the team asks you to do, not mope around the arena
I know you started with a disclaimer but the column seems a bit of an over-reaction. It is just one weekend series out of 82 games. I think we need to judge the body of work over a longer haul. That said, love your work. Thanks for the alternative approach to what we usually get.
Speaking of disclaimers....a few more and it would start to sound like one of those drug commercials! LOL
Just kidding DK.
Disclaimer points. taken, no over-reaction.
Agree w/3/4 of the column, rest not so much.
But , hey its only November.
A criticism of Johnston when they are 13-3-2?! Ha, welcome to the dark side - but yeah, comments are spot on. As noted, in the big picture, it's a blip, but unlike other current/former burgh coaches, I have high hopes (this) Mike will be willing to learn from this.
It's Institutional Hockey Bullshit Kiss the ass of has been vets like Adams & SCRUBderi while Fing over young players like Despres & Megna. Shorter versdion Meet The New Boss, Same as the old Boss
I'm not speaking for Dejan . . .
. . . but anytime I write an article that I have to go back and add disclaimers to——I am wedded to the words and not to the message. Message should always be ultimate.
.
. . . when I write an article so critical of normally good, I am TIRED
Some handle nuanced, full-context viewpoints better than others. Not every statement has to be some sweeping, universal proclamation. (Unless, of course, it's politics.) But since you brought it up, felt better about this column's construction/content than any in a long time.
Also, I didn't 'go back and add disclaimers.' I wrote the piece in the chronological order presented. The disclaimers came first for reasons you're making very obvious.
Psychologically and practically, why would the Pens opt to shoot first in a shoot out.
If Fleury stops the first shooter the Pens gain a big edge. They have three opportunities to score and the opponents only have two, with MAF likely to stop one or both shots.
Maybe Johnston wanted to see how the Pens handle a playoff situation and got exactly what he anticipated. A flat reactive group like the last several playoff years. Now, hopefully he can begin to fix this team before the real playoffs. Failing now to succeed in the future. Hope!!!
November 21, 2014
Column: Johnston flunks his own first exam
by Dejan Kovacevic • Columns • Penguins
Kyle Okposo goes hard forehand to beat Marc-Andre Fleury for the winning shootout goal. — GETTY IMAGES
DEJAN KOVACEVIC, DK ON PITTSBURGH SPORTS
Apologies in advance, but this deserves all kinds of disclaimers before the first significant sentence:
• The Penguins’ 5-4 shootout loss to the Islanders on Saturday night was one game of 82. It was no big deal from the season scope nor even this singular outcome. It came down to the final, decisive strike by New York’s Kyle Okposo. Could have been anyone. Could have gone either way.
• The Islanders are as skilled, as creative offensively as any team in the NHL. If you don’t think so, power up that DVR and take a harder look. They’re legit.
• Mike Johnston has been nothing less than a godsend.
And I can’t stress that last one emphatically enough. Jim Rutherford couldn’t have fared any better in finding the right man with the right plan for this group.
But — and yeah, I’m finally getting to that first sentence — Johnston just failed his own first exam.
Not by my definition. By his own.
These were his words earlier in the week regarding this home-and-home that continues Saturday night in Uniondale: “You have a chance to prepare for a team, play a game and react to how you’ve played and what you need to do the next day. You know they’re going to react, and they’re going to adjust their game plan. I look forward to these two-game series that we have because it does give us a chance in the busy schedule that we have to see simulate playoff action.”
Well, wonderful.
The Penguins under Dan Bylsma treated the regular season as if mattered, which, for a team blessed with so much talent, it didn’t. They could coast from October to April and still finish among the East’s top eight. As a result, they’d foolishly convince themselves that having one get-to-our-game system was plenty and that their way could trump any counter-strategy.
Johnston is to be commended for stating and behaving, from his opening drills of camp, as if the regular season only matters as a launching pad for the one that follows.
So, why oh why, would he have picked this game to unleash his inner Bylsma?
No, really, how else to explain his worst move coming hours before faceoff with the inexplicable healthy scratching of Simon Despres?
He’d been one of the Penguins’ most dynamic defensemen through the first 17 games, and one of those unmistakably was a bullish showing in the 4-0 shutout Tuesday in Montreal. He was aggressive on the attack, smart with the puck, physical and sharp in his end.
He didn’t deserve a benching. He deserved a boost in ice time.
He didn’t deserve a blow to his confidence. He deserved assurance that, just because the coaching staff wanted Robert Bortuzzo involved, it wouldn’t come — as it almost always did under Bylsma — at his expense.
I asked Johnston about his decision, in precisely that context, right after this game:
Some might find that answer acceptable. Sorry, I don’t. Johnston’s first order of business today is seeking out Despres, attempting to explain what happened, then letting him know with a pat on the shoulder that he’ll be back in the lineup Saturday and for the foreseeable future. If Johnston was serious when talking about learning from his mistakes, he’ll correct this one immediately.
I don’t want to read too much into body language, but the sagging Despres I saw walking out of the Penguins’ room late Friday night sure looked like a guy who could use that.
Once Johnston mends that fence, he can get about doing some DVR duty himself and, from there, admitting that his New York counterpart, Jack Capuano, handed his hat to him.
The Islanders came out hard, much more emotionally invested, much more ready to pounce.
“If there’s one thing we could change, it’s how we started,” Marc-Andre Fleury said, hardly omitting himself after a first period in which the Islanders put three of their first eight shots behind him, including an unscreened wrister by fourth-liner Matt Martin that originated somewhere in Swissvale. “They were really flying, and it took us a while to match that.”
That’s no big deal for mid-November. But to remind, it was Johnston who hoped to use this as a playoff barometer of sorts. That message apparently never resonated, if it was even received.
Next, Johnston can ask what in the name of all that is sane he was thinking to pair Bortuzzo and Rob Scuderi, his two slowest defensemen, against a group of forwards that is the NHL’s fastest without Michael Grabner, the league’s fastest skater currently to injury. If Grabner had shared ice with that duo, he’d have looked like one of those 99-rated skaters in EA video games.
Next, Johnston can ask how a system predicated on putting pucks to the net only did so twice in the game’s opening 15 minutes, even though the Islanders’ backup goaltender, Chad Johnson, couldn’t control rebounds in the slightest.
I asked Johnston about that, too: “We passed up some shooting opportunities to try to make plays. We weren’t doing enough, especially early on.”
Hm. At least one of the Penguins’ players afterward intimated that part of the plan was controlling the puck — not shooting it — to wear down New York’s defensemen and suppress their attack. If that was, in fact, vocalized, it wouldn’t be the kind of adjustment any team would want to make. Shots are your friend. Always.
Finally, and this is a little thing by comparison, but Johnston balked when asked how he felt about the Penguins having no power plays in a game that was plenty chippy at times: “That was a well-reffed game. I didn’t think there were any penalties that deserved to be called.”
One must assume, then, that he took no exception to the vicious, dangerous leg-on-leg hit by the Islanders’ Johnny Boychuk on Evgeni Malkin, one that felled Malkin for roughly 90 seconds. Malkin was lucky to return, and Boychuk would be lucky to avoid a suspension and/or fine if this weren’t the NHL we were discussing. Especially if anyone is familiar with a bit of history between Boychuk and Malkin.
Do what no one at the league will do, and watch this hit for yourself:
Never mind how a ref misses that. How does a head coach miss that?
You’d better believe that working the refs, during and after a game, are part of the playoffs.
So, class, what’s been learned?
First, to repeat, the Islanders are legit. Just ask Fleury:
Second lesson: It’s better to fail the midterm than the final. That’s tonight.