Senquez Golson, the Steelers’ second-rounder, leaps for a pass aimed at Memphis’ Tevin Jones. — GETTY
BY DEJAN KOVACEVIC
Maybe my problem is that I think more of the Steelers’ chances in 2015 than they do.
Honestly, that could be it.
Because, see, the view from here entering this NFL Draft was that this team, blessed with one of the NFL’s most bodacious offenses that includes bona fide MVP candidates at quarterback, wide receiver and running back, could have positioned itself to do something special. And not two or three years from now, but right now. This very fall. If only Kevin Colbert and Mike Tomlin would have taken meaningful steps toward upgrading its 27th-ranked pass defense.
Check that: Colbert and Tomlin could have begun such positioning back in the free-agency period by signing … well, someone, anyone. As opposed to watching reliable Brice McCain walk.
They didn’t. They waited, they watched, they shrugged.
Oh, and they talked about how the draft could help fill the hole. Tomlin mentioned that a month ago, and both management men reiterated it earlier this week.
But here we are, now three rounds deep into this draft, and all they have to show for it are the latest in a litany of first-round linebackers, Bud Dupree of Kentucky, followed by an undersized corner, Senquez Golson of Mississippi, in the second round, then a wide receiver of all positions, Sammie Coates of Auburn, in the third round. The latter two came last night, an evening that, in all candor, left me as underwhelmed as the one before it.
It’s not about these players. Underscore that, please, and it in all bold.
It might well be that Dupree was a steal for falling to No. 22, or a “gift,” as Colbert called him. I wrote as much in the column that night, not denigrating the kid in the slightest.
It also might be that Golson was the best corner available at No. 56. In spite of his 5-8 1/2 height, he was outstanding for Ole Miss this past season with 10 interceptions and not a single missed tackle. He also was an 11th-round pick of the Red Sox in Major League Baseball’s draft three years, turning down a $1 million bonus because, “Football is in my heart.”
Neat kid. Sounds like quite the overachiever, too, based on that heart.
I asked Carnell Lake, the Steelers’ secondary coach, about that:
There isn’t much to knock about Coates, either, at No. 87. He’s 6-1, 212, thicker than that sounds but blistering at full speed. He’s got what Richard Mann, the Steelers’ wide receivers coach, called “amazing athleticism, things you can’t coach.” A three-year starter at Auburn, he had seven 100-yard games and 13 touchdowns.
Best of all, he’s built for big plays, with 42 percent of his targets coming on routes of 20-plus yards. In a 206-yard showing at powerhouse rival Alabama, he caught touchdowns of 34 and 68 yards, a performance he remembered this way: “Our coaches let me loose, and I had fun.”
After which he added, “I felt like I left a lot of plays on the field.”
Right. There are the drops, too. Experts felt his propensity for failing to hold onto even routine passes caused him to drop to the third round, and Mann didn’t exactly shy away from the topic when I brought it up: “He has good hands. He does. I think — and I saw him four games — they didn’t play him every down. A lot of times, players can lose concentration simply because they aren’t involved. That’s not an excuse for him. That’s what I saw. We can coach him up.”
They might be just fine. All three of them.
I’ll repeat this yet again, since some reader reaction to the Dupree column strongly suggested I didn’t sufficiently delineate the difference between criticizing a draft approach and draft picks.
What I don’t like here is the lack of aggressiveness, the lack of urgency. That’s about approach.
When the Broncos saw the edge rusher they wanted, Shane Ray out of Missouri, John Elway traded with the Lions to move up from No. 28 to No. 23, and they tossed in two fifth-round picks and offensive lineman Manny Ramirez. Say what you will about Ray and all his baggage, or even the picks given up, but Elway got his man. He placed the greatest value, in light of overseeing a legit AFC contender, on getting his man. And yes, getting him at the primary position of need.
That was the first round. Yesterday, there was a bunch of this.
The Titans held the first pick of the second round and, by all accounts, made it known by the afternoon that it was up for grabs. According to ESPN’s Adam Schefter, the Steelers were among those that inquired. But they didn’t get it. The Giants did, swapping second-round picks and giving up a fourth-rounder and seventh-rounder to get their man, Landon Collins, a safety out of Alabama and a player the Steelers, too, had targeted.
Later in the round, the Eagles had a need at corner, and they had their eyes on Utah’s Eric Rowe, another target of the Steelers. Chip Kelly got his man, too. All he had to do was flip positions in the round — five spots apart — as well as giving up two fifth-rounders for a sixth-rounder. Big whoop.
And for the final kick in the gut, same round … well, sit down for this if you aren’t already familiar: The Steelers were set to take Maxx Williams, a burly, pass-catching tight end out of Minnesota, when the Ravens leapfrogged one spot ahead to steal him for the bargain price of a fifth-round pick sent to the Cardinals. That’s right: A successor who could have been the heir apparent to Heath Miller instead will be playing for their most reviled rival.
Yeah, Ozzie Newsome and John Harbaugh got their man, too.
Colbert and Tomlin could have done any of this. They didn’t. They waited, they watched … and they did the best they could at their allotted slots, as if handcuffed to their chairs.
Sorry, but that’s not good enough.
I’m not suggesting that one superior corner would convert the Steelers’ defense into something special. Or even a superior corner and a superior edge rusher. That would be silly. Way too many question marks would remain.
But I am suggesting that the Steelers wouldn’t need much more than an ordinary defense to compete, with everything that Ben Roethlisberger, Antonio Brown, Le’Veon Bell and the rest of the No. 2-ranked offense can bring. And that’s to say nothing of the fresh heights it might reach if, as expected, Martavis Bryant takes another stride forward and stretches the field for Brown, Markus Wheaton and Heath Miller. It could be a spectacular group, no hype.
Colbert and Tomlin know this. They have to see this.
So why, then, stick with standard operating procedure in the draft?
To protect those late-rounders in the name of depth?
Hey, that always sounds good, but the reality is that for every AB that pops up in the sixth round or Vince Williams in the sixth or Kelvin Beachum in the seventh, the Steelers’ past five draft classes encompassing rounds 5-7 comprised Crezdon Butler, Stevenson Sylvester, Jonathan Dwyer, Doug Worthington, Chris Carter, Keith Williams, Baron Batch, Chris Rainey, Toney Clemons, David Paulson, Terrence Frederick, Terry Hawthorne, Justin Brown, Nick Williams, Shaquille Richardson, Wesley Johnson, Jordan Zumwalt, Daniel McCullers and Rob Blanchflower.
From A to Zumwalt, that’s a whole lot of special-teams and practice-squad filler, as is the case, of course, for most NFL teams.
That’s worth preserving over getting your man?
When the team should be following up a division title with moves toward something more?
But hey, whatever. If they can shrug, so can anyone else.
But who's to say they're not getting their men? I'm sure if there were players on their board that they truly wanted and didn't have any other needs to fill, they would. But they clearly have backup plans in mind. A leaky secondary isn't going to change overnight. Add a playmaking ballhawk to it, though, and you've got one piece of the puzzle. Add a freak pass rusher to make their job easier. Add another weapon for Ben so that you're always a threat to outscore the other team regardless of how your defense is playing. At the end of the day, you trust your board and what you have on it. And if you don't, that's when you make your move. The Steelers have been content with the overall depth of this class. When they haven't been? They've traded up for Troy Polamalu. They've traded up for Santonio Holmes. They've traded back, on several occasions, if there's nobody they value. It's about trusting your own process, not appeasing the fans and analysts with their perceived value of your picks and who you draft with them. Since Colbert has taken over as GM, this team has had all of one losing season and been to three Super Bowls. He helped shape this roster into a contender and now he's having to reload it again as we've watched familiar faces drive off into the sunset the past few years. There's a certain air of entitlement around our draft process lately despite the fact that it has yielded what is, year in and year out, a competitive roster.
What year were Polamalu and Holmes drafted? Recent history is not so kind, bud.
phil.I.am
5-2-2015, 2:24 am
Secure that positivity. No one wants to hear it. Content Pittsburgh sports fans are not welcome here.
Scaldis Noel
5-2-2015, 4:20 am
Alex B, you seem to have missed the entire point of DK's article, which is "win now". At this point, with the talent they have on offense, it's no longer about building the year-in-year-out contender that you expounded on. Moving up in the draft to fill specific needs is what championship winners do when their window is open. Building a roster by keeping or stockpiling picks through trades is what rebuilding teams do. When moving up in rounds one and two only means giving up a couple of late round picks that only on a very rare occasion produce above roster-filler free-agent level, you do it if your goal is to win now.
John Hoebler
5-2-2015, 7:25 am
Win now mode? So drafting a Williams in the second round is win now mode. See Ebron, Eric. 9th overall pick. Scouts graded him much higher than Williams. Not a lot of rookie production. And if they draft Williams who are you going to not put out there. You have 5 spots on passing downs bell brown Bryant are locks. That leaves Heath and Wheaton. Heath stays you need the middle of the field guy and a blocker. So win now is the potential incremental difference between Wheaton and maxx. Proven vs rookie potential. Maybe Williams will turn into gronk down the road but little impact on 2015
meteo99
5-2-2015, 12:49 am
Tomlin and Colbert's egos are too big. They've had success, granted, but it's becoming a blindfold. Obviously, they know they've made mistakes with their past linebacker picks, and they're solely out to correct past wrongs. Only the drug of hubris could cause them to be so lax when refusing to address a secondary with no safety, strong safety, and cortez allen.
Exactamundo! Where is the urgency? The current CB groups is among the worst in the League...27th against the pass does not lie. They actually got WORSE than last year b/c they lost McCain.
Cortez Allen, benched for being downright awful, couldn't even get on the field in the dime package later in the season is now expected to start! Gay is another year older. Mike Mitchell had a poor year last year and Shamarko Thomas is unproven and untested. Please, someone, anyone tell me with a straight face that you have faith in THAT secondary and I've got some real nice "ocean front" property in Florida to sell you.
"But hey, whatever. If they can shrug, so can anyone else." You got that right DK
Bpn, all that I have read regarding the Golson pick, CBS, ESPN, etc, is that Golson is an impact player and can step in right away and contribute...was a four year starter at Miss. Does that sound like a project?
Also, would you have taken Rollins over Golson?
Alex B
5-2-2015, 1:04 am
Pump the brakes on the ball skills? Is leading the NCAA with 10 interceptions as a CB while playing in the SEC supposed to not be a pretty decent indicator of good ball skills?
bpn8pitt
5-2-2015, 1:16 am
I honestly do not remember the last Steeler rookie who stepped in right away on defense and played well. Maybe Woodley.
In my opinion, other than QB, there is no greater learning curve than DB going from college to NFL. Recent Steeler draft history proves this. Even Troy and Ike struggled early. And the rules make it even more difficult.
We're gonna have to agree to disagree on this one, bud. Look at some of the AFC North wideouts he's gonna have to cover. There's no way in hell he will be left alone in single coverage on those guys for a long time.
bpn8pitt
5-2-2015, 1:34 am
Who were the QBs, Alex? Half of them came against Louisiana Lafayette and a godawful Tennessee team.
The SEC and their players can be vastly overrated sometimes.
EddieT
5-2-2015, 1:35 am
If Golson is not left alone in single coverage, then who will be on the field with him? The interceptions look great on film, but he wasn't exactly blanketing the receivers on those plays. I greatly hope that he plays bigger than his size, but the names Harvey Clayton and Sam Washington popped into mind. Further, the smaller guys tend to get injured more easily.
Alex B
5-2-2015, 5:49 am
"Who were the QBs, Alex? Half of them came against Louisiana Lafayette and a godawful Tennessee team."
He recorded at least one interception in every single game he played this year. Are you being serious right now? You play the opponents you're given in the SEC, and he did the same thing to all of them. He picked off the lesser QBs twice instead of once? Good. That's what he should be doing.
bpn8pitt
5-2-2015, 9:20 am
Name me a QB he picked off that will be drafted Alex.
Brandon S.
5-2-2015, 12:59 am
Great article. I was content with the first round picks... But it's clear these players weren't the ones they had HOPED would be there. Instead of ensuring they get there guy it's a "well.... this is close enough" approach.
The Steelers released a picture of their war room. It showed a very highly rated TE was on their board. They only have themselves to blame if they lost out on Maxx.
You say urgency, DK, and I say FLEXIBILITY. That's willingness to move up and down. That's not drafting Sammie Coates when you could fall back a few spots and still get him if you reall want him. Like Dri Archer last year, it's a total luxury pick.
Maxx isn't any better than Eifert, and Eifert has been a bust
Scott Hey Hey
5-2-2015, 1:27 am
Eifert got injured and missed a lot of last season, I believe. I don't think that qualifies him as being a bust.
Alex B
5-2-2015, 1:52 am
"Eifert got injured and missed a lot of last season, I believe. I don't think that qualifies him as being a bust."
Oddly enough, this same predicament still qualifies everyone to talk about Jarvis Jones as if he is a bust, however.
Scott Hey Hey
5-2-2015, 2:23 am
I wouldn't classify Jones as a bust, yet, but he's already had 2 years in the league, while Eifert was a rookie last season. Jarvis definitely needs to show something this season!
Ike727
5-2-2015, 7:07 am
Last year was Eifert's second season. He was drafted in 2013 just like Jarvis Jones was.
If Dupree was gone yesterday, when he was supposed to be, I think we would have seen a trade-up for Marcus Peters. But as they both lasted relatively late, and they knew they were content with either, they stood pat.
Not really any excuse for letting the Ravens leapfrog them for Williams though.
I didn't mind the Dupree pick but tonight has me drinking a lot more than I expected to. Almost threw a brick at the tv when the Ravens leapfrogged and took Williams.
Tomorrow - "in the 4th round the steelers select Tyrion Lannister, 3'9" cornerback from Kings Landing University"
Nothing against the players they've selected so far, and I wasn't disappointed with the 1st round pick, but they definitely needed to be aggressive in the 2nd & 3rd rounds in addressing the secondary, and I think they failed terribly. I'm not so upset that they took Golson, but he should have been their 3rd pick, with the previous being acquired at the top of the 2nd round, and also being a DB. Unfortunately, their draft approach is resembling the demeanor of Tomlin on the sidelines during games, and in post game interviews, passive and emotionless with no sense of urgency. I'm afraid they are going to waste the prime years of our franchise QB, and all his accompanying great weapons, with their lackadaisical approach to upgrading the defensive backfield. The offense is going to need to score 50+ points against the good teams, just to have a chance.
Oh, how I long for the days of the flying spittle!
Scott Hey Hey
5-2-2015, 3:05 am
Although, this is about the draft, I will add, the offense does need to help the defense out more than it has in the recent past. All too often they have taken their proverbial "foot off the gas" after getting up early by 21 or 24 points, and they've ended up in tight games that can go either way. In today's NFL, a 24 point lead with a quarter to play isn't safe. Even "bad" teams can score in bunches, quickly. Plus, they still settle for FGs instead of TDs entirely too often. You don't see that from New England, Denver, Green Bay, or any of the other great offensive teams.
Bill
5-2-2015, 1:19 am
I could not have expressed my feelings any better than you just did, DK, in this column!
But, you know. Colbert and Tomlin get paid the big bucks to do this strategy/picking/coaching thing for a living and what the hell do I know, right?
Here we go Steelers... Take my money. Maybe I won't be left scratching my head again at the end of the season
Yes and no. Waynes was worth trading up for. Kevin Johnson maybe. After that, the CB class wasn't blow-away magical that they needed to, especially with a legit top-10 guy in Dupree there.
As for Day 2, again, no CB there was worth trading up for and they got the best on the board. Yes, his size is an issue, but that didn't affect his tackling or coverage in the best division in college football. He'll be fine. The 3rd-round pick was good from a BPA perspective, not great from a need perspective, but they could have done worse.
Believe me, I've been underwhelmed by Pittsburgh's drafting for a decade, and it used to be an area where they waxed other teams, and to me, they're only in "B"-level territory, but trading up is risky. New England seldom trades up, and they usually do damned well.
Also, DK's list of throwaways he shitted into the end of a post? They have 29 NFL starts between them according to NFL.com. Not games played, not games played during an offensive or defensive snap, games started. Doesn't seem so shitty now.
Honestly don't know what you're trying to say with that last paragraph, but if you look at the list of those players, I guarantee the majority of those starts are from one guy...Dwyer.
cherokee23
5-2-2015, 6:23 am
I was agreeing with ya til the last paragraph!
thebulky1cometh
5-2-2015, 1:40 am
While I spent some time angrily jabbing my fingers on a previous article, DK goes ahead and drops this fantastic article. I simply do not understand the WR pick. It's equivalent to Dri Archer last year, or Landry Jones a few years ago. The Steelers are still sauntering around like it's 2008 and they can afford experiments, depth, and luxury. Even IF the CB is good - no, great - you're still looking at another year of Mike Mitchell swiping grass, a great unknown in Shamarko Thomas, and then who knows what at the other corner. Oh, and by the way, Jarvis Jones and Ryan Shazier are unproven too. Did I also mention the hilariously scary lack of depth along the D line? Keeping walking around with your arms bowed wide and your chest puffed out - we'll see if you do indeed "Run the North."
I would prefer to attempt a pithy and articulate criticism of the Steelers' drafting approach. However, more blunt language pops into mind. With that defense, the team has no room for luxury picks like Dri Archer and potentially Coates. The arrogance of Tomlin is hard to take during the season, but that arrogance is now dominating the drafting and player acquisition strategies. What in the world are the Steelers thinking? Other than their belief in their superiority, that is. The team has a secondary which is utterly bereft of talent. A unit that often constitutes 45% of the defense on the field, and they think that one little guy is going to fix everything, and therefore another receiver could be selected. As you say, though, why bother worrying? The Steelers are so sure of themselves that they are not listening to any criticism.
The Steelers don't think that one cornerback will fix everything. That entire line of thinking is skewed by your own misconceptions of the draft process. You can't conceivably plug every hole in a draft. The job is not to say "hey, let's throw all of our picks at the best players available at our biggest holes" and call it a day. You can't make a decision based on which hole is bigger, you have to pick the best player to fill a hole. Will having a better pass rush not help the secondary? Will having more weapons on offense not alleviate pressure from the defense as a whole? We're drafting a team, not a secondary. Shortsightedness and tunnel vision like the kind you're displaying here is what keeps bad teams bad. The Steelers, a perpetual playoff team, know what they're doing.
EddieT
5-2-2015, 2:07 am
Rather than predict any more draft selections, I will make a different prediction. New England is going to thoroughly embarrass that defense on national television. The team's corners in that game will look like young boys trying to keep up with men. Harrison will be held all night without a holding call, and the Steelers' secondary will need to actually try to cover some receivers. It will be sickening, considering the strong dislike of Brady and Belicheck which comes naturally. Without Bell, the offense will struggle and Brady will have a few extra possessions to run up the score. After the game Tomlin will say that the loss is "on me". Yes it most certainly will be.
Vincenze G.
5-2-2015, 7:29 am
How arrogant that Tomlin, just through his years in the NFL & his position as a Super Bowl winning coach, thinks he has the right to disregard fans opinions & make decisions on his own. He's lucky to have any job. He should take a poll on each draft choice (nay, each play call during the season) and follow them religiously. Or maybe hold a drawing & let a random fan make the pic. Couldn't be worse. Better yet, let's get a coach who isn't so arrogant. Cowher ALWAYS did what we wanted & we won all those super bowls with him. Enough of Tomlin, that uppity....
Vincenze G.
5-2-2015, 7:29 am
coach
RayPo
5-2-2015, 8:26 am
"The Steelers are so sure of themselves that they are not listening to any criticism" Thank goodness for that.The day the Front Office starts listening to the fan base for advice is the day it's time for a new front office.
keithc
5-2-2015, 6:41 pm
I like the 1st round pick. I watched an extensive scouting film on him. The things he needs to work on are coachable things. He has all the physical skills you'd want. The 2nd Rd pick ? He's smart and has good skills. But you can't teach a kid to be taller. And 176 pounds is 176 pounds no matter how big the heart is. The 3rd Rd pick made no sense at all. They needed DB help a lot more than a 4th receiver. Dumb pick.
Joe
5-2-2015, 2:11 am
Didn't that genius John Elway move up to pick Tebow a few years ago?
actually I think that was pre elway could be wrong but I'm pretty surevelway came in the next year.
@SteelersNasty
5-2-2015, 2:58 am
No... Josh McDaniels drafted Tebow.
Scott Hey Hey
5-2-2015, 3:20 am
Brian Xander was the GM at that time, but McDaniels was the coach. Elway came into the organization the next season, and became GM in 2014.
Scott Hey Hey
5-2-2015, 5:24 am
Correction...Elway became GM in 2012. Still, 2 seasons after Tebow was drafted by those mentioned above.
cherokee23
5-2-2015, 6:28 am
ElwAy got rid of Tebow fast as he could, even after a playoff victory
Day Short, Dollar Late
5-2-2015, 2:21 am
Who is to say right now that the approach is wrong? The steelers had the 26th ranked pass defense in the league. 30 yards separated them from being ranked 6th. 30 yards a game. Thats one big or two medium plays. That's it. So could a better pass rush, stout run stopper freakish athlete (Dupree) and a ball hawking knock down or two (Golson) make up that difference? Or could an extra first down or two a game keep the defense off the field (5 wide with AB, Bryant, Wheaton, Heath and now Coates) and potentially get 6 more points a game? Sure we didn't make a splash (pun intended) play in the draft, but the approach might have gotten us the right picks...
The run stopper part doesn't help the pass defense, but point taken. Hopefully we're all worrying for naught.
Scaldis Noel
5-2-2015, 4:33 am
30 yards PER GAME is an enormous difference. To chalk that up to "one big or two medium plays" is to downplay the huge gaping chasm that is their secondary.
cherokee23
5-2-2015, 6:29 am
"It's a fine line" as Cowher used to say!
Ed Gallagher
5-2-2015, 3:59 am
Spring is in the air. The nights are getting longer and the griping about the Pens first round exit and failure to be "heavy" changes to the Steelers failure to draft the "right" guy. Next up, Nutting's failure to buy a 3D printer to craft an artificial knee for Cutch. Did Arians draft his 5th string QB that will be the "steal of the draft?" One thing that has been proven. He'll need him come December.
DK no one could've articulated the situation any better, you hit it out of the park. I would add that it's quite apparent the Steelers decision makers know there is no accountability in what they do, they're free to make as many mistakes and repeat them as often as they like!
I'm confused DK. All the guys on ESPN couldn't praise the pick of Golson anymore than they did. Raven fan Kiper called it bad news for the Ravens. Somebody called it the best pick i the draft. I was scared of his height, but was pleased with their reaction.
He's not criticizing the players selected, but the way in which the Steelers are just waiting and picking who is still left, instead of targeting who they want and then doing what it takes to go get them.
Scaldis Noel
5-2-2015, 6:49 am
Reread this sentence from the 8th paragraph:
"It’s not about these players."
John Hoebler
5-2-2015, 7:37 am
Which is just odd. Everyone seems to like the player we got by supposedly not trying to move up (and maybe they were) and then criticizes them for staying put. Sorry this is a circular argument there approach got them a player everyone praises but we should be critical that they were not aggressive enough to potentially get someone else that people may of liked at a position with less need. So let's pay this out let's say that we could of traded up inn the first and second at the cost of our 3,4 and 5. Now we have peters (assuming Johnson was too far to get too) and Williams. And that is it from this draft. It seems to me having the three we have and two more picks seems a safer bet than a head case and a late second round tight end with potential. No?
Superfan99
5-2-2015, 6:08 am
For what it's worth, there is a report that the Ravens wanted Dupree in the first round, but they didn't offer enough to move up.
If that's true, couldn't this same critique apply to them?
Urgency: Let's do something different--not necessarily better.
I preface this by saying I enjoy this site--but criticism of their "urgency" is baseless. So teams trade and that makes them better?
Pittsburgh is a professional sports town with little understanding of college football. College football discussion focuses more on non-stadiums than games played. Even this site--there have been more stories about the Pittsburgh Riverhounds than college football. All of this is perfectly acceptable.
So taking to Twitter and making a slight against Golson's height when the Steelers select him--yet praising Philly's _____ for taking Eric Rowe just reaffirms that anything can be used to make any argument. Golson covered Amari Cooper all game and held him to one of his least productive outings (one of only 5 games where he did not find the end zone).
The Steelers added three players from SEC schools who may or may not work out. The Steelers added a top pass-rushing prospect to address 33 sacks, a corner who forces turnovers and had as many INTs last season as Steelers CBs combined and a WR who can return kicks, punts, and has the physical abilities in the mold of Santonio Holmes.
To close: if the Steelers would have traded up and taking the same players--the response would be better received because "at least they were doing something." Instead, Eric Rowe is held in praise because Chip Kelly "got his man". It is all perception. Rowe is not a better corner than Golson.
Thanks for saving my fingers from typing any more. Well said.
Tom
5-2-2015, 9:29 am
Spot on comments, 100% agree.
Also add that its funny how fans will knock Dupree for being a combine warrior and not showing much on tape, and at the same time Knock Golson for not having great measurables despite having plenty of great tape. Makes my head hurt
Tom
5-2-2015, 9:36 am
Also, for everyone crying about letting Brice McCain walk, he's a whopping 3/8 of an inch taller than Golson.
cherokee23
5-2-2015, 10:41 am
Agree with your sentiment, Nick
nikep63
5-2-2015, 1:19 pm
Bravo. Excellent. I guess some people don't believe the Steelers got who they wanted, yet believe that other teams did. "Sense of urgency" was filling OLB and CB position. They did that. They also need a 4th WR. Sorry, Coates pick doesn't compare to Archer pick. Coates has M Bryant skills. Golson is a ballhawk. Dupree is a big multiple skill OLB. All three played in the SEC. Sometimes I wonder if some people are really studying these picks.
And they just drafted Doran Grant CB from Ohio State. Another solid pick. I would say they know the "sense of urgency".
peter vasilaros
5-2-2015, 6:31 am
Last year everybody said you had to get Gilbert or Dennard. Boy those guys were huge difference makers last year. I personally didn't see any CB worth losing any picks for. Don't see not getting the TE as big loss either. Could just hear the crying if they would have picked a TE in 2nd and not a CB
Rarely, does a CB, no matter what draft pick he might be, come in and make a big impact in his first season.
dan.sunseri
5-2-2015, 6:32 am
There lack of urgency to fix the CB issue is really astounding to say the least. Listening to Gerry D last night it appears they targeted Eric Rowe. He happened to be my favorite pick also. But they sat back and watched him drop. Then they did nothing they could have had some balls and moved up to take him they waited. Then he is gone then a another corner. Then the TE. The drafting of Golson and Coates tell me that the corner issue is not their priority. Hell all they need to do is give up 30 less yards per game and they can become mediocre and not terrible. So the goal now is mediocrity. Yea yippee.
Thanks for taking my anger on this draft and channeling it correctly. So great, we have a corner to cover the slot when we could have had a starter by giving up a guy we will pick in the 5th or 6th that won't be on the team next year. Very disappointing. The Eagles are much happier this morning.
Hell, with THAT secondary, Brady might get 7 or 8.
Rocco
5-2-2015, 6:48 am
If the Steelers would have taken a TE in the 2nd round, I would have shaken my head worse than I did when the Pirates used that stupid shift against Reynolds last night.
The last thing this team needs to be worried about for this season, is a successor to Heath.
It is odd to criticize a team for lacking urgency and not trying to win a title this year, and then criticize them for not using a 2nd round pick to draft a TE who would be no more than a part time employee this season.
I have no problem with what they did last night.Denver moved up because they had to have a DE. I guess if the Steelers moved up to draft a weed smoking prospect we as fans would burn down Heinz Field.
As for the Ravens, they need offense as their defense is pretty good.
As for Golson, yes he's short but he played in the SEC and was first team All-American. Tremendous athlete.
After all there is no guarantee any of these players drafted the last two days will become stars.
How do we know that they didn't try to move up and were outbid? Maybe they tried and were rebuffed. Maybe they knew what it would cost and said it was too much. Maybe they were told by the teams ahead of them that they weren't moving and when the board unfolded that team decided it could drop down and still get their man and the Ravens pounced. Should the steelers have traded up one spot to get someone that they thought they would get anyways and/or had a reasonable alternative. You seem to be suggesting that they had the wrong approach by looking at the end results of what others did. And maxx lasted until the late second. Let's not anoint him yet. I am glad they got a corner vs a luxury offensive weapon who doesn't block. If he can help keep the opponent to one less score a game from time to time. That seems to be worth something too
I hear they even tried to make a deal with the Bengals but were rebuffed. Ravens deal was easy with AZ, no love lost between BA and the Steelers I would assume. Didn't read anything about a deal between AZ and Pgh
mmallek104
5-2-2015, 7:34 am
No, they act like they have the luxury of taking the best player available. They are stuck being stubborn to their old methods that have failed them the last 7 years which have led them to the where they are. Their defense sucks because of bad drafting so you can't just do the same old thing. Get after it as Tomlin says to his players but fails to do in personnel. By the time their old tired method makes the defense any good (if ever) the offense that is so amazing right now will be gone.
John Hoebler
5-2-2015, 11:08 am
So a trade of two picks for one is what you wanted? I am no expert but looking at the scouts grades Rowe and our guy are closely rated as corners. So is it worth giving up additional assets to get the slightly higher rated corner. We will know in 3'years but for now I would say no
king of rock
5-2-2015, 7:28 am
Fact: if Steelers had NOT drafted a CB in 2nd round there would be no END to the wailing and gnashing. Argue all you want about the quality of a collegiate CB 2nd round pick in May...maybe they should have traded up to get Rowe, or drafted Quinten Rollins instead at that slot. They are all equally abstract to me right now. I know if we got Heath the sequel in 2nd with no CB, we all would have freaked. (And, yeah...I AM including you DK!)
I really believe the Steelers are going to be wasting a great offense this year unless they win games 42-35 on a consistent basis. Their inability to address the secondary is inexcusable and they will pay for it no later than the first game of the season against Tom Brady.
I, like many of you, were completely mystified by the Steelers draft choices. But I think I've got it now. The are going to move Shazier to the secondary and play prevent on every down and hope the other team doesn't score a TC every time and win every game 55 - 51.
Although I don't know that I am surprised anymore (or even care) I have become so used to poor drafting now that I feel like I am a Browns fan. No one here can say just trust the Steelers way, the Steelers way was draft best available, but actually draft WELL. They have proven over the last 7 years that this group can't be trusted to actually draft well. So it is literally status quo, draft like its 1975 or 1995, just do it poorly. Nice job Shero and Byslma... oh I mean Colbert and Tomlin.
You’re correct Dejan about the draft and Colbert/Tomlin's lack of concern about the Steelers defense and especially their much depleted secondary. I have been growing very frustrated with the Steelers player acquit ions and the lack of ability to address glaring needs. What a darn shame to finally have a franchise quarterback, a franchise running back and a franchise receiver all on an offense that can only win if they can outscore what the leaky defensive secondary going to give up.
There first two picks the last two years were on defense. I don't think that is lack of concern
unipress_5463ead9c8c0c
5-2-2015, 7:56 am
Maybe they like Branchflower, Maxx dropped because he's averaged sized & didn't grade better than ebron so no loss there, I would've liked Rowe but Golson can play in & out & your 3rd corner is a starter anyway nowadays. They can get some solid corner/safetys in rds 4/5
Completely agree. Just understand why your preserve a chance at finding the "diamond in the rough" and ignore the fact you have a chance to win NOW. Week 1 Brady will spread your secondary out and pick them apart. Ben better put up 350 years and 4-5 TDs or it'll be a long opening night in New England.
They picked a lb and cb. It isn't like they didn't pick a lb and cb. Hard to criticize the position choices. Now criticize them for not taking a db the last few drafts and you have a point but the time to set yourself up to win now is 2 seasons ago
Tim
5-2-2015, 8:04 am
It's frustrating for this management team to, year after year, fail to address the biggest needs ... and then fail to explain why. The "Steeler Way" (outdated) of keeping coaches and GMs for the long haul gives Tomlin and Colbert no fear for their jobs. Yes, the Steelers' record (results) in the Tomlin-Colbert era has been good, but the holes (approach) are glaring and this will eventually lead to poorer results. The best way to improve the results is to improve the approach. Ticking time bomb out there, soon to detonate ...
Their draft approach kinda sounds like the Penguins' ... poor draft after poor draft, and being enamored with one position while ignoring positions of need. At least the Pens finally wised up and made a management change. The draft results weren't the only reason, but they were a factor.
With all due respect, because you're the best in the biz, you are completely off basis here. I suppose being aggressive would be good, but at what cost. In the first round, they god Dupree over Rae. We don't know what will happen in their careers, but there's lots of baggage in Rae and he doesn't fit the system at his size at that position. Plus, the NFL just put him on the substance abuse watch list. I agree that we could have moved up in the 2nd for Collins or Rowe, but the two teams that did move, did at lower price than the Steelers because they didn't have to move up that many positions. For the Steelers to get the 33rd pick, they would have to give their 2nd, 3rd and 4th for a SS. OMG, Steelers Nation would have gone crazy that we didn't get a corner. Giants moved up 7 spots and the Eagles 5 spots. And the TE, did you see his film. He's no Heath in a very poor TE class. Again, Steelers Nation would have gone mad if we took a TE over CB. It's not the best draft, but it's not all doom and gloom as you allude. Sorry to be critical. Just my opinion.
What? What part of my response shows your unnecessary comment? Oh, that's right, you are from Pitt. Makes complete sense now.
BTW, look at ALL of the other comments that point out exactly what I wrote.
jasonward14
5-2-2015, 8:26 am
Most frustrating draft in a while. The Williams thing just slays me. One lousy trade up to get Rowe, ensure Williams, snag Peters in the first, and they can't pull it off?
The Steelers shot themselves in the foot,these past years on the defensive side and waited too late to get younger.Because of all the holes they have on defense,they needed all picks.They weren't aggressive in FA,so they put themselves into this situation.
We didn't need another WR,we needed to draft big prototype CB's,not undersized ones.
I hope the remaining rounds left,they don't continue to blunder again.
An aggressive and great move to compliment the offense NOW would have been to make the Collins move and then give up future picks to get Rowe. That would have give us great depth and talent on D. That's what I would have done. Like you said, we haven't done much with later picks anyway and we sure didn't need another WR right now.
I agree with your premise, going into day 2 I was hoping they would be willing to part ways with their 2nd Rd pick next year to move up 10-15 spots and get Rowe or Collins.
However, I'm having a hard time reconciling the outrage over the 2nd round pick. Day 1 it was "OMG they didn't draft a corner" and day 2 its "OMG they drafted a corner and let the Ravens get their TE". (I'm paraphrasing people's responses, not your column). It feels like there would have been outrage if they took a TE given all the defensive needs, but yet there is still outrage even though they got a solid corner.
I dunno, if the Steelers HAD traded up for Williams I think the reaction here would've been "Where's the cornerback?" And justifiably so, as they're desperate for cornerback help. The fact that it was the Ravens who traded ahead of us might make it seem they got one over on us, but it's not like Williams is considered the second coming of Tony Gonzalez and we have a lurp at TE. Heath doesn't break tackles anymore, but he catches and blocks quite nicely.
And let's not forget that a lot of TE looks in the Steeler offense now go to a guy named Bell out of the backfield. I'm quite pleased with a draft that so far gives us a pass rusher, a ball hawking corner, and another fast WR to terrorize opposing secondaries. Jesse James in round 5 would mean the Steelers would have Golson and James instead of Maxx. I'll take that deal.
The Steelers lack of urgency astounds me...while every team made trades to get who they wanted, the steelers just sat and waited. Those teams didn't even give up much of anything to do so either. I had to stop watching right when the Ravens leapfrogged us to get Williams... I was beyond pissed. That might as well been a giant middle finger to the Steelers from Baltimore.
The part I really agree about is adding a CB and probably slot WR in FA. Not clear how i feel about Coates. May be great. does not really address the WR need, which maybe could have been done in FA... but I'd rather have a potentially great WR than a meh TE.
TheCoburntMan
5-2-2015, 8:38 am
I also agree that people would've said "why didn't we take a corner!!" if we drafted Williams, but it would've been better than reaching and drafting an undersized corner who we probably could've got in the 3rd. This of course is all based off of the minimal amount of picks/players given up to make these moves, which actually has been shocking to me.
Last thing team needs is stretching for a player just to say we got "X" to play position "Y". And volume for the sake of volume isn't a wise approach. Five years from now we'd be saying there is not one player on roster from 2015 Draft.
Where I will fault them is miscalculating demand on CBs in 2nd Rd in what was characterized as a draft with only a few top-end CBs. They likely felt 1 of 2 CBs would be there at #22 but when they elected to make no move and they were gone, no CB had 1st Rd grade. So they waited, knowing they had plenty of CBs with 2nd Rd grades. Problem is that is where many teams ahead of them targeted their CB as well. Maybe a lot of teams reached or we did the wise thing.
. . . and will just say they've done pretty well so far, all things considered.
As Jagger sang, you can't always get what you want. But we just might find that we got what we need.
Arriba Wilver
5-2-2015, 1:41 pm
Exhibit A---Troy Edwards.
DJ
5-2-2015, 3:24 pm
Precisely AW. And then you spend next few years trying to get it right when you got it wrong first time around. Wasn't Burress the year after Edwards?
Find your stud in 1st Rd -- a Faneca -- don't reach, and then enjoy the next 10 yrs.
Daniel
5-2-2015, 8:50 am
Dejan, this is the first article since I subscribed of which you and I disagree.
What I see in this draft is a whole bunch of question marks. It seems EVERY pick has significant negatives. NFL.com's project evaluations show that. Landon Collins, Maxx Williams... all of them. So why would the Steelers panic for the sake of "urgency" to take one of those guys?
Bud Dupree may be a star or he may not pan out. I am so happy that the Steelers didn't reach for a CB at that slot, though.
Golson looks GREAT on tape, so why would they waste that pick -- and more -- on Collins, who is described as nothing more than a run-stopper (and played on a loaded Alabama team with lots of support... just look at past Alabama safety "can't misses"). And Maxx Williams's knock is that he needs to work on his blocking. So how would he be Heath Miller's heir apparent?
I am seriously happier they got Golson. He may end up being a bust, but you could say that about ANY draftee in ANY round. Why don't we watch him play, first?
The Steelers needed DBs and an OLB. So far two of their three picks fill those needs, and there are more CBs, Safeties, and Tight Ends available later. I personally think Jesse James from PSU could be better than Maxx Williams, for instance.
I was scratching my head with the WR pick in the third, but I was also wrong about Martavis Bryant last year, so maybe the Steelers' coaches know a little more than I do.
I love your articles and I am glad to be a Lunatic, but I have to disagree with this one, brother.
I get the knock on Golson is his size, and he will lose most of the jump balls to bigger receivers, but I look at it this way Ike Taylor was 6 foot 1, and couldn't intercept a pass, make tackles consistently, or track the deep passes, and these are all things that Golson does extremely well...as long as the kid is in position he is going to make plays...lets try to not focus on his size, but how he plays, because I would rather have a smaller CB that can make plays compared to a bigger one that doesn't!
Your last paragraph citing the Steelers recent picks in rds 5-7 summed everything up very well. "let's not risk good practice squad material to get our man"
So, the Steelers have picked up:
1. an uber-athletic linebacker (let's call him the anti-Jarvis) who can rush the passer, defend the run, and drop in coverage and has legitimate Clowney potential (in all the ways except attitude)
2. The BEST playmaking DB in the draft who already has all of the production and skills to step in and play from day 1 in some capacity (who happens to be 1.5 inches shorter than standard and FWIW Kiper and many other scouts loved but thought teams were afraid to pick because of those 1.5 inches)
3. Another legit uber-athletic deep threat to line up with AB and Bryant to cause legitimate lost sleep for DC's everywhere
And the complaint is they didn't move up to grab Mike Mitchell 2.0 or Heath 2.0 when we already have those guys? Seems hard to think there are a better combination of 3 prospects the Steelers could have hoped to snag while also not giving up the potential to find the next AB, Beachem, Keisel, et al.
Good column, DK. When they should've been aggressive in this draft, they've let the picks come to them. Now the jury will be out on the impact these guys will have
i think the annoying part that dk is referring to is that the steelers sat in place figuring they would get cornerback x. the problem was that teams below them - with far less urgency at cb - were trading and getting in front of pit and taking all the good cbs wnd safeties. MANY teams in rd 2 did it. then their backup plan of a big te went out the window as well.
How did you know they didn't try and they did get a good cb. Maybe they valued him plus the pick they had to give up more than their evaluation of the incremental diff between Rowe and ghlson
bpn8pitt
5-2-2015, 9:07 am
Name all the starting cornerbacks under 5'9 in the NFL.
Precisely. One thing you cannot teach is height. I'm sure there are a lot of smart, positionally sound football and basketball players, but that doesn't mean they can be effective in the best Leagues in the world.
How exactly is Golson going to defend the fade in the corner of the end zone against guys who have 5-7 inches in height, another 5-7 inches in arm length/span and 5 inches jump on him? If I'm a Steelers opponent, I go to that play ALL DAY!
DC-Steeler36
5-2-2015, 9:09 am
Steelers Nation - relax!
You can't judge a draft class for 2-4 years, which is why I tune out Mel Kiper and the litany of mock drafts.
THIS YEAR - the Steelers need Shazier and Jones to stay on the field and be productive. Thomas needs to make the best of his opportunity. I don't know anything about these first 3 picks other than the stuff put out by NFL Network and ESPN - it doesn't matter right now. What matters is how soon they can contribute and be productive. I don't fault drafting an edge rusher in the wake of Jason Worilds' stunning retirement. I don't fault them for taking a ball-hawking corner even @ 5'8" -- he'll contribute in the nickel immediately. The Steelers' defense in the Lebeau era (they're still playing the Lebeau defense) is predicated on stopping the run and pressuring the passer. Remember - the best pass defense is a strong pass rush. The Steelers have been miserable at stopping the run the last 2 or 3 seasons -- we might ask why they haven't adequately addressed the need for a gap-stopping nose tackle since Casey Hampton left the game. Adding another potential target for Ben is not a bad idea -- introducing competition for the 3 through 5 receivers is healthy. I'm not sold on Wheaton and apparently Tomlin isn't either.
I've criticized Colbert and Tomlin quite frequently, and I think they project arrogance and aloofness -- but so what? They work for the Rooneys, not us. Over time, the "Steelers Way" has proven to be highly effective at putting a competitive product on the field.
I'm going to wait and see and not be presumptuous in the first week of May.
DK while I may share your apathy to the to way this draft is shaping up I don't see your usual level head analysis in this column.
Yes the Titans made it known that they would trade down, but they also made it know in reports I read that they would want a round 1 pick in the top half of the draft. The Eagles likewise had a better pkg than the Steelers could possibly put together, they had a lower first round pick and didn't have a second fifth rounder. Oh, you aren't really upset that they didn't get a backup tightend over a defensive player are you?
Now did they need to draft a receiver in the 3rd over another DB I don't know I'm not a draft junkie so I can't say who might have been a better pick, but I do know trades take two teams to agree and I can see why the Steelers came up short on the ones you mentioned.
You're referring to the number 2 pick overall. DK was referring to the Titans' second rounder, at 33.
VABurgher
5-2-2015, 10:14 am
Mea Culpa , but I did sayI wasn't a draft junkie. Don't understand the fixation people have with it would rather watch paint dry than watch the draft.
XRayVisn
5-2-2015, 9:13 am
I agree with your premise Dejan. I think the Steelers only trade move was to have moved in front of Vikings and grab Spartan corner Trae Waynes. He would have given us a Woodson like corner for ten years. Considering what we did with third round pick, would have used that as bait in trade.
Woodson? Rod? Man, not from what I've seen on tape.
Ike727
5-2-2015, 9:40 am
And there's no way a third rounder would have been enough to move up that far in the first round
chaddha4
5-2-2015, 9:16 am
DK- I often agree with your columns regardless of sport, but we differ here. We drafted 3 players who have playmaking upside. We needed an OLB and DB and got them - time will tell if they are any good, but that is always the case. We added another weapon to the passing game - and honestly a TE in the second would have been wrong with our DB needs. We don't need to make trades to have a good draft. If they thought Senquez was better than Collins and Rowe, then why trade? Sometimes your guys fall to you. Two years ago the knock was that we lacked athletes and playmakers. They have been trying to draft them ever since. To me, the approach is fine - take athletic playmakers at key positions. Let's see how these guys pan out.
Who you picking in the Derby, Naje? And don't say Mayweather. ;-)
Naje
5-2-2015, 1:57 pm
Arriba... it's fine May-Weather here in the Ville... I've got a 5-8-10-18 exacta box... really love American Pharoah... Dortmund is the biggest thoroughbred I've ever seen; looks like a double-wide trailer. But the track is pretty powdery (not much rain at all in past week) and that may not be good for the big, nearly 1,300-pound Dortmund...seems like horses on the lead have been getting leg-weary down the stretch this week.
Was at the Oaks yesterday and it was spectacular racing... over 123,000 in attendance.
An exacta wheel play: 8-18 / over 2-3-5-6-8-10-15-18-20.
Have a great Derby AW and all!
Jim Richey
5-2-2015, 9:27 am
Colbert is to linebackers as Shero is to defenseman.
Great analogy. Seriously. One position so focused on that other positions suffer. Let's hope Golson isn't Beau Bennet. Everyone had that kid going in the 3rd or 4th Round, Steelers took him in Round 2.
Ls40095
5-2-2015, 9:29 am
DK, you just earned my subscription to your site. This is the best, most honest article I've read in years. Tomlin is an idiot, no match against other NFL head coaches and should have been fired in favor of BA. #firemiketomlinfacebookgroup
It seems like they have drafted three class acts. They won't fail due to a lack of effort. Sometimes heart is more important. We will see.
Nick Humbert
5-2-2015, 9:46 am
I hate to pile on DK--you can see my response earlier about my disagreement with your stance--but it is no coincidence that your first opinion on Golson was his height. You have a picture implying Golson's lack of height as an issue. Yet, this receiver, Tevin Jones, caught one pass for 4 yards in a 24-3 loss to Ole Miss last season. I fell for it. Steelers topics are always click bait. Using his size as an example of Steelers sitting on their hands is incorrect.
Moreover, Ole Miss allowed only three 100 yard receiving contests last year. Guess who had the most yardage against them...you guessed it: our third round selection Sammie Coates.
Golson covered everyone's number 1.
Golson's height will only be a factor on deep balls. This implies seven stop drops by the QB. Steelers have been decimated by the dink and dunk all the way back to when LeBeau was in Cincy in December of 2001 and exposed the Steelers inabilities to cover entire field. Golson is a ball-hawk who can stay with receivers early in routes. Investing in OLBs like Dupree will negate size issues on deep balls because precision is needed on those passes.
The Steelers have a plan. No one is screaming that New England took a safety in round 2 with a 7th round grade. I beg everyone to look at their draft history and tell me how/when they became the paradigm all teams aspire to emulate. They won the lottery in the 6th round of 2000. And while I am piling on the Patriots someone name the best QB in the AFC East Brady/Patriots have played since 2002?
I only bring up the Patriots because no one would dare question their personnel moves. And most uninformed football fans perceive their organization as forward thinking and beyond reproach--while the Steelers annually freeze at the draft like a child performing in front of an audience.
Who were the QBs he faced? Can you name one without looking?
Nick Humbert
5-2-2015, 9:57 am
@bpn8pitt Soory I cannot reply to your comment for some reason. Yes--I went to college in south (do you really want me to name them)--I can name them all. Dak Prescott was Heisman-worthy in 2014. How many QBs were better than him? Or Texas A&M that had Kenny Hill before he melted down and gave way to the #1 rated QB Kyle Allen in second half of season (and will have to fend off Kyler Murray) to keep his spot.
So, where are we suggesting is the oasis of QBs/talent if it is not the SEC? I am an FSU grad and can tell you it is not the ACC.
bpn8pitt
5-2-2015, 9:57 am
Looking at the list of guys who lead FBS in football, not one of the top CBs drafted is on that list. You know why? Teams wouldn't even throw at them.
Everyone's looking at the 10 picks. Does it mean he can catch? Sure. But it appears teams had no problem throwing his way. Even after he made INTs. Makes me wonder about the accuracy of those throws. How many were tips?
bpn8pitt
5-2-2015, 10:02 am
Kenny Trill? Really bro?!?
Nick Humbert
5-2-2015, 10:03 am
@bpn8pitt It is your right to question the pick. I am using the picks and the assignments to justify why he is worthy of the pick. He was an All-American in the most pro-style conference and was the best defensive back on the 16th best pass defense in FBS. He makes plays and contained the 4th overall selection in the 2015 draft when no one else could.
Is he perfect? Of course not. But you can go tirelessly split hairs over anyone draftee's performances.
bpn8pitt
5-2-2015, 10:10 am
We'll see. From college to NFL, QB play is obviously better.
I don't think teams were afraid of that guy at all. That's why he had such a crazy amount. Even as the year went along.
Nick Humbert
5-2-2015, 10:10 am
Well--with all due respect--you are judging the validity of Golson's INTs as potential tipped balls.
Kenny Hill before the Ole Miss Game: 24TDs and 5INTs. I do not want you to think I am lying so I provided the link.
Lake looks like the guy from SNL who was with Obama at the press party.The Steelers have a way of staying the course no matter how off course they are. The Steelers lack imagination and balls when it come to player and roster decisions. One thing is clear, this defense is lacking talent in every area especially DB's. NE game will set the tone and no amount of the Steeler way will cover for a crapo defense.We don't live in our fears, neither will Tom Brady when he sees this defense.
The thing I don't get is... At 5-8, he can't possibly be asked to cover the top WRs in the league, which means they basically just spent a #2 pick on a nickel back. I guess that's more important than it used to be, but they still have no one to cover AJ Green, and that concerns me. I fully expect at least one comical highlight of Golson getting trucked by a true NFL sized athlete.
Agree 100%. If I'm a Steeler opponent, I put a tall guy on him and hit the fade all day in the red zone.
Paul Bodziach
5-2-2015, 10:04 am
Trading up for a player like Landon Collins probably would have been a mistake -he is weak in coverage. Just what we need, another run stopping DB (sarcasm). I'd rather have the WR than the TE. If he pans-out, our 4 wide set could be unstoppable.
The skinny: The team needed to take a corner, but in Golson it got one who is 5-foot-8 and probably went a round too early. Coates' issues with drops are well documented, and that won't play in the Steel City.
And Mark Kaboly from the Trib:
2nd round – Senquez Golson, CB, Mississippi
Golson’s size is an issue, but let’s see if it becomes a terrible issue. I am OK with calling it a reach, because that is what it was. It’s hard to imagine that Golson was the highest player left on the Steelers’ board at 56.
GRADE: C+
3rd round – Sammie Coates, WR, Auburn
Another player that has some questions surrounding him. He can provide a deep threat, but is limited in some of the other things he can do.
GRADE: C+
Looks like fans aren't the only ones not enamored with Day 2.
Not surprised by the performance of this group at all. Lousy strategy or poor execution. Or both. Gone are the days of waiting for 2 years before the player is ready is year 3. I love the Steelers but as the last 8 years or so have gone by I'm beginning to really dislike this team because of two guys mentioned the most in this column - which is spot on for this vantage point. Not only do we get to watch teams whip us on our home field in the playoffs but we get to watch them continually whip us in the draft room and front office.
Let the Ravens crow (pun intended) over getting Williams, but in my opinion they saved the Steelers from themselves, if indeed they were intent on drafting him. Granted that they need to replace Heath eventually, but he's not done yet, and in my view, drafting Williams would have been a massive waste of a pick in the second round. Meanwhile, B'more, who needs a DB at least as much as the Steelers, failed to address that area in the first three rounds--I've seen comments on their fan sites complaining that THEY weren't bold enough to trade up for Waynes in the first--and while they did shore up their offense with their first two picks, their secondary is still a mess. Time will tell if any of these guys pan out, but I feel good that the Steelers addressed their most pressing needs and added extreme athleticism on both sides of the ball, assisted mightily by the Ravens' pointless gamesmanship.
easy to tell by this article that hockey is your favorite sport ... if only you would be half as critical on your boys the penguins ... How can you write something like this after all the defending you do for the penguins game after game and the heartless effort you supported against the rangers? Please just once put away your man crush on the penguins and be as non bias as you are with the other pittsburgh teams on your next penguin article
I'm confused, DK. You talk about a "win now" attitude that you want, and yet one of your complaints was that they allowed the Ravens to jump up and take away a future replacement for Heath.
This draft seems to be pretty polarizing so far. Either you love it or you hate it. While I lean toward the latter, I liked John Clayton's take on Golson. He makes some really good points.
They also could have taken TE Huerman (?sp) from OSU in third round, and passed to take a wide receiver who will be no better than 4th or 5th in the depth chart. Huh?
Is it arrogance? Started with this approach with free agency...did they forget how awful that D has played the last few years...painful....to top it off Baltimore slipping in on them...should've moved up to get C Collins or Rowe...disappointing however they want to spin it...
Bravo! It is about time someone called the Steelers on their passive approach to the draft. I would have been waiting for them to make a move but history has taught me Colbert and Tomlinson just don't get it. And Coates was a patently absurd pick.
Nothing Abbot and Costello does surprises me anymore. I just try not to let them upset me as much as they usually do. When they are talking on TV I change the channel. I used to always watch the Steelers press conferences after there games - but I cannot stomach Tomlin anymore. Oh well - IT IS WHAT IT IS
You say where's the urgency I see 8 draft picks and 6 of them on defense, they might not have traded up to pick so and so but they restocked the defensive shelves for sure by keeping all there picks. Just my 2 cents.
It's becoming very obvious that the Steeler's drafting team has little idea what they're doing. The rest of the AFC North out drafted them once again. It's all very disheartening...again!
Dejan, I agree with you about 99% of the time. In this case, I just don't. I don't think Colbert neccesarily should've traded up to get the player they wanted. I'm sure that considered it each step along the way but there are too many needs this year. Need to improve depth as much as anything.
DEJAN KOVACEVIC, born and bred Pittsburgher and professional sports writer since 1990, was named one of the nation's top four columnists by the Associated Press Sports Editors (2011) and National Headliners (2013).
HOW TO SUBSCRIBE
DK on Pittsburgh Sports is a subscription site. One month is $4, one year $24, three years $54. That last level is just $1.50 per month. SUBSCRIBE HERE.
May 2, 2015
Column: Where is Steelers’ urgency?
184by Dejan Kovacevic • Columns • Tags: Steelers
Senquez Golson, the Steelers’ second-rounder, leaps for a pass aimed at Memphis’ Tevin Jones. — GETTY
BY DEJAN KOVACEVIC
Maybe my problem is that I think more of the Steelers’ chances in 2015 than they do.
Honestly, that could be it.
Because, see, the view from here entering this NFL Draft was that this team, blessed with one of the NFL’s most bodacious offenses that includes bona fide MVP candidates at quarterback, wide receiver and running back, could have positioned itself to do something special. And not two or three years from now, but right now. This very fall. If only Kevin Colbert and Mike Tomlin would have taken meaningful steps toward upgrading its 27th-ranked pass defense.
Check that: Colbert and Tomlin could have begun such positioning back in the free-agency period by signing … well, someone, anyone. As opposed to watching reliable Brice McCain walk.
They didn’t. They waited, they watched, they shrugged.
Oh, and they talked about how the draft could help fill the hole. Tomlin mentioned that a month ago, and both management men reiterated it earlier this week.
But here we are, now three rounds deep into this draft, and all they have to show for it are the latest in a litany of first-round linebackers, Bud Dupree of Kentucky, followed by an undersized corner, Senquez Golson of Mississippi, in the second round, then a wide receiver of all positions, Sammie Coates of Auburn, in the third round. The latter two came last night, an evening that, in all candor, left me as underwhelmed as the one before it.
It’s not about these players. Underscore that, please, and it in all bold.
It might well be that Dupree was a steal for falling to No. 22, or a “gift,” as Colbert called him. I wrote as much in the column that night, not denigrating the kid in the slightest.
It also might be that Golson was the best corner available at No. 56. In spite of his 5-8 1/2 height, he was outstanding for Ole Miss this past season with 10 interceptions and not a single missed tackle. He also was an 11th-round pick of the Red Sox in Major League Baseball’s draft three years, turning down a $1 million bonus because, “Football is in my heart.”
Neat kid. Sounds like quite the overachiever, too, based on that heart.
I asked Carnell Lake, the Steelers’ secondary coach, about that:
There isn’t much to knock about Coates, either, at No. 87. He’s 6-1, 212, thicker than that sounds but blistering at full speed. He’s got what Richard Mann, the Steelers’ wide receivers coach, called “amazing athleticism, things you can’t coach.” A three-year starter at Auburn, he had seven 100-yard games and 13 touchdowns.
Best of all, he’s built for big plays, with 42 percent of his targets coming on routes of 20-plus yards. In a 206-yard showing at powerhouse rival Alabama, he caught touchdowns of 34 and 68 yards, a performance he remembered this way: “Our coaches let me loose, and I had fun.”
After which he added, “I felt like I left a lot of plays on the field.”
Right. There are the drops, too. Experts felt his propensity for failing to hold onto even routine passes caused him to drop to the third round, and Mann didn’t exactly shy away from the topic when I brought it up: “He has good hands. He does. I think — and I saw him four games — they didn’t play him every down. A lot of times, players can lose concentration simply because they aren’t involved. That’s not an excuse for him. That’s what I saw. We can coach him up.”
They might be just fine. All three of them.
I’ll repeat this yet again, since some reader reaction to the Dupree column strongly suggested I didn’t sufficiently delineate the difference between criticizing a draft approach and draft picks.
What I don’t like here is the lack of aggressiveness, the lack of urgency. That’s about approach.
When the Broncos saw the edge rusher they wanted, Shane Ray out of Missouri, John Elway traded with the Lions to move up from No. 28 to No. 23, and they tossed in two fifth-round picks and offensive lineman Manny Ramirez. Say what you will about Ray and all his baggage, or even the picks given up, but Elway got his man. He placed the greatest value, in light of overseeing a legit AFC contender, on getting his man. And yes, getting him at the primary position of need.
That was the first round. Yesterday, there was a bunch of this.
The Titans held the first pick of the second round and, by all accounts, made it known by the afternoon that it was up for grabs. According to ESPN’s Adam Schefter, the Steelers were among those that inquired. But they didn’t get it. The Giants did, swapping second-round picks and giving up a fourth-rounder and seventh-rounder to get their man, Landon Collins, a safety out of Alabama and a player the Steelers, too, had targeted.
Later in the round, the Eagles had a need at corner, and they had their eyes on Utah’s Eric Rowe, another target of the Steelers. Chip Kelly got his man, too. All he had to do was flip positions in the round — five spots apart — as well as giving up two fifth-rounders for a sixth-rounder. Big whoop.
And for the final kick in the gut, same round … well, sit down for this if you aren’t already familiar: The Steelers were set to take Maxx Williams, a burly, pass-catching tight end out of Minnesota, when the Ravens leapfrogged one spot ahead to steal him for the bargain price of a fifth-round pick sent to the Cardinals. That’s right: A successor who could have been the heir apparent to Heath Miller instead will be playing for their most reviled rival.
Yeah, Ozzie Newsome and John Harbaugh got their man, too.
Colbert and Tomlin could have done any of this. They didn’t. They waited, they watched … and they did the best they could at their allotted slots, as if handcuffed to their chairs.
Sorry, but that’s not good enough.
I’m not suggesting that one superior corner would convert the Steelers’ defense into something special. Or even a superior corner and a superior edge rusher. That would be silly. Way too many question marks would remain.
But I am suggesting that the Steelers wouldn’t need much more than an ordinary defense to compete, with everything that Ben Roethlisberger, Antonio Brown, Le’Veon Bell and the rest of the No. 2-ranked offense can bring. And that’s to say nothing of the fresh heights it might reach if, as expected, Martavis Bryant takes another stride forward and stretches the field for Brown, Markus Wheaton and Heath Miller. It could be a spectacular group, no hype.
Colbert and Tomlin know this. They have to see this.
So why, then, stick with standard operating procedure in the draft?
To protect those late-rounders in the name of depth?
Hey, that always sounds good, but the reality is that for every AB that pops up in the sixth round or Vince Williams in the sixth or Kelvin Beachum in the seventh, the Steelers’ past five draft classes encompassing rounds 5-7 comprised Crezdon Butler, Stevenson Sylvester, Jonathan Dwyer, Doug Worthington, Chris Carter, Keith Williams, Baron Batch, Chris Rainey, Toney Clemons, David Paulson, Terrence Frederick, Terry Hawthorne, Justin Brown, Nick Williams, Shaquille Richardson, Wesley Johnson, Jordan Zumwalt, Daniel McCullers and Rob Blanchflower.
From A to Zumwalt, that’s a whole lot of special-teams and practice-squad filler, as is the case, of course, for most NFL teams.
That’s worth preserving over getting your man?
When the team should be following up a division title with moves toward something more?
But hey, whatever. If they can shrug, so can anyone else.
Share this: