Tuesday 12 Qs: Polanco, Staal, Tuitt, Ferry

IMG_9523

Gregory Polanco smashes a ball high and just to the right of the big batter’s eye at Pirate City. — DEJAN KOVACEVIC

BY DEJAN KOVACEVIC

Welcome to Tuesday 12 Qs, our chat that takes place each week at 9 a.m. and offers you a chance to carry the conversation. Use the comments below to submit an entry. No more than one per person, please. Submit early if you prefer, and I’ll pick from that batch to get rolling.

UPDATE 9 a.m.: Away we go …

Radio Wave: DK, do you think most Pittsburgh fans are in favor of or against Major League Baseball’s new pace-of-game rules?

Tuesday12Qs

DK: I’ll sometimes praise or criticize fan behavior or sentiment, but I’ll never advise on what anyone does or should think. I’ve honestly got no clue, though I’d be interested to hear more of what some of you think beyond what I’ve already read in comments.

It was brought up with Clint Hurdle in Bradenton a couple days ago, and he bluntly told us he wouldn’t put much more thought into it than happily supporting any initiative MLB wants to take in this regard, adding, “We’re aware that we’re in the entertainment business, and I know that Joe Torre has done a lot of work on this.”

My own feeling was that the moves were woefully inadequate — baseball games have become ridiculously long, which hurts nearly everyone involved — and basically skirted the issue. They might shave off 2-3 minutes and no more.

One foot in the box?

Why not both?

I never liked the clock idea because part of baseball’s beauty is that it’s played without time restrictions, but there are so many other ideas that could have been implemented by little more than the umpires enforcing existing, logical practices. And if he didn’t like what he was seeing, call a ball against the pitcher or a strike against the batter.

You’d see nine innings in 2 1/2 hours with the snap of a finger.

Mike: Do you think Jim Rutherford would make the same trade twice to get Jordan Staal back? It certainly wouldn’t work unless another salary was moved but even if Derrick Pouilot turns out to be a star, wouldn’t Staal be more useful for this current group trying to win in the here and now?

DK: Here’s what I think, and some won’t like it: Within the same 24-hour span, three local media outlets reported on the Penguins being interested in reacquiring Staal, with all three throwing in the caveat that it probably wouldn’t happen — if it happens at all — until after the season.

I won’t judge the veracity of anyone’s reporting. Because, as is the case in the reverse, I don’t know what goes into theirs anymore than they know what goes into mine. And in this specific case, since I was in Florida for the past week, I’d know even less about the specific circumstances.

But I will say that I’m very surprised that I’ve yet to hear, read or see anyone mention the extremely real possibility that management was smart enough to lay this out there over the weekend in an attempt to get Brandon Sutter out of his three-month malaise.

Remember Ryan Kesler?

Remember how Ray Shero was pursuing Kesler — for real — just this time a year ago?

And how it ticked off Sutter and spurred him on to become nothing less than the Penguins’ best forward in the playoffs that followed?

Come on already. If that isn’t the elephant in the room here, with Rutherford surrounded by lieutenants who were here last season, with the Penguins having zero means of acquiring Staal with cap constraints that currently wouldn’t cover 20 percent of his salary, with the GM bizarrely talking about the original Staal-Sutter trade with a local publication on the record in a rare public discussion about another franchise’s player … I’ll say it again: Come on.

Ron Francis, now Carolina’s GM and as trustworthy a man as I’ve ever met, had to blow this smokescreen by telling the Raleigh media he’s absolutely not trading Staal.

But that won’t matter to the Penguins one whit if they’ll have achieved their real goal here and Sutter suddenly takes off as he did last spring.

In the interim, a whole lot of folks will have been seriously played.

PittFan412: With James Harrison recently announcing that he will return for another season, how do you see him fitting into Keith Butler’s defense and might this affect the Steelers drafting an OLB in the upcoming draft?

DK: Whoa there, Harrison might want to return, but that doesn’t mean he’s returning to Pittsburgh. I wrote in Friday Insider two weeks ago that I don’t see Harrison coming back, and all that’s changed about those circumstances is that he wants to play another season. There has been no above-the-table indication from management either way, but all of the undercurrent is that it’s time to move on from all of the four iconic defensive players in question, including also Troy Polamalu, Brett Keisel and Ike Taylor.

With all due respect to all four, I hope the Steelers stick by that this time. At some point, the Cam Heyward types need to take over this defense, and others need a chance. That’s not to suggest they’re exactly overloaded with talent. They aren’t. But younger guys such as Jarvis Jones and Shamarko Thomas need to enter as default starters. It’s time.

Harrison could rejoin Dick LeBeau in Tennessee. It would be a wonderful fit for both. The mutual respect there is immense.

Randolph Yinzer: We all know you love Winnipeg in the winter, so after a week in the Sunshine state during the Artic vortex, which destination do you prefer more?

DK: I really don’t care much about the weather, wherever I go. If it’s cold outside, it helps to keep my favorite Starbucks drink properly chilled. Other than that, it really doesn’t affect my life. I don’t go to the beach. I don’t swim or scuba dive. And for that matter, I don’t ski or curl.

I did try curling in Manitoba a couple years ago. Didn’t exactly pan out …

Comparing Winnipeg and Bradenton on the scale of what makes places interesting, Winnipeg wins on a scale of about a gazillion to one.

Big Daddy: DK, while you were down Bradenton, did you notice a more laid back atmosphere from the players knowing that the majority of the roster spots are already filled compared to past training camps when players had to open up eyes to make the roster?

DK: Yeah, and I’m glad you asked this. It really is different.

I brought it up with Hurdle just yesterday, as a matter of fact, and his response included this: “We’re having fun. We’re smiling. But we’re also going about our business, getting done what needs to get done and getting it done with a sense of purpose.”

As usual, the manager’s summation can’t be topped.

It’s a camp with a very confident feel to it, but also one in which no is shy about lightening the mood. Before A.J. Burnett took the mound for his bullpen session yesterday, he walked back to the water cooler, filled two cups and approached both catchers in the pen — who’d already worked with other pitchers — and strolled to the plate to offer refreshments. Francisco Cervelli and Tony Sanchez both looked delighted that he did.

That kind of thing.

ajbeam7: We all can assume how you feel about the most recent scratching of Craig Adams (throw in an “obviously” from Mike Tomlin). But what was the reasoning? Why now? Why even bother at this point? Seems to be hollow now. I’m really just left scratching my head in bewilderment.

DK: Mike Johnston’s explanation, which he’d made beforehand, was that he’s looking to rotate players out of the lineup to keep them fresher for the playoffs. Feel free to accept that. I don’t.

Some players are more equal than others. Scratching Adams or Steve Downie won’t carry any weight toward that explanation unless it cycles through the top two lines, as well. And I’m not seeing that happening, given the increasing tightness of the Eastern standings.

Don’t misunderstand: As you suggest, I am all in on scratching Adams. But do it on merit rather than some pose-striking. That’s all this looks like.

Obviously.

Colin Stephen: Obviously, you think cornerbacks are the weakest position on the Steelers’ defense. What do you think is the strongest position on defense?

DK: This is a great way to phrase this question because, no matter which position one cites, it’s accompanied by an asterisk of some sort. Maybe the highest ceiling is at inside linebacker, if Ryan Shazier gets it together along with Lawrence Timmons. Maybe it’s defensive end, if Stephon Tuitt can blossom into a bookend for Cam Heyward.

What you really find out by doing that is that there isn’t one. There just isn’t. There’s potential here or there, a bit of depth here or there, but no one spot where you can say, man, that’s just so solid it doesn’t need to be addressed. They all do. Every last one of them.

It’s funny, but for as much as everyone cringes at the thought that the Steelers could take advantage of a draft filled with good edge rushers, the truth is that they really aren’t set there, either. Far from it. And I say that even if Jason Worilds is extended and Jarvis Jones comes to camp looking like a healthy Hercules.

Maybe management needs to be reminded of that before wasting third- or fourth-round picks on science projects and clipboard holders.

blufftalk: Dejan, what would it take for Duquesne men’s basketball to be a big player in the city again? The Atlantic 10 is a very good basketball conference, after all.

DK: I’ve long been convinced that the Dukes would draw a lot of attention, and almost immediately, if they were successful again. Maybe even just modestly successful, to the point where their own fans could see them as genuine contenders in the A-10, even if the rest of the basketball world doesn’t. I base that partly on their distant past but much more on the memory of the Dayton upset at Consol Energy Center a couple years ago. Sellout crowd. Real passion. Genuine enthusiasm.

I wrote early this season that Jim Ferry’s approach is the correct one, generally speaking, and I’m not backing off that even through the Dukes are again near the conference basement at 4-10. He could have continued rounding up juco ringers who’d have no attachment, no investment and no sustained time on the Bluff, or he could have put together a terribly young roster and taken his lumps along the way to something possibly greater. He’s done that, and I applaud it.

That doesn’t make some of the results this season excusable. There have been some real stinkers along the way. It also doesn’t excuse not seeing more improvement from freshmen TySean Powell, Eric James and Jordan Robinson. I thought early on Powell, in particular, might step up and start before long. Hasn’t happened. That’s partially on the player, more on Ferry.

Bottom line: Better players are needed. Many of them. And losing begets losing in college sports, so good luck attracting the really good ones to Duquesne.

Maybe a change at athletic director would change the outside view.

Maybe a change would be beneficial regardless. All Greg Amodio has done in his time on the job is subtract, subtract, subtract from sports as a whole.

Ronak Singhal: If Pitt doesn’t make the NCAA tournament, they are going to look back on some of their early losses (like to Virginia Tech) and kick themselves. The team now looks very different than from even a month ago. What’s changed?

DK: I don’t think it’s as much a negative, really, as a positive. The Panthers have gotten better. Jamel Artis is growing into a terrific ACC player. Sheldon Jeter and now Chris Jones are close to that. Mike Young has come out of his shell. James Robinson has finally shown a shooting touch, something I was sure would never happen. It’s a young roster that, after some early struggles to find an identity on offense and continuing defensive shortcomings, has gotten better.

I’m not burying Jamie Dixon over this if they miss out on NCAA, if only because any team built on a sophomore class like this should be getting better over the course of the season. And it should be even better the following season. Or the season after that.

Now, if this group isn’t getting it done then …

meredydotcom: Do you have many subscribers in far away states and other countries?

DK: Tracking our subscribers isn’t something we do, for privacy reasons. I’ll never have that data and, candidly here, I don’t want it.

We do track our readership, which, of course, is made mostly of subscribers, as that’s a vital part of our business, and we do that through Google Analytics, the industry’s gold standard for this stuff. I can tell you that our site has attracted readers from 131 countries, including one each from Azerbaijan and Bangladesh. (Clearly, I need to ramp up the cricket coverage.) The top five countries are the U.S. (94 percent), Canada (2.5 percent), United Kingdom (0.55 percent), Germany (0.32 percent) and Australia (0.3 percent).

Pittsburgh is No. 1 among cities, which shouldn’t surprise, but it’s only at 10.63 percent, in part because we’re talking about the city proper, not suburbs. Next on the list, believe it or not, are New York (3.67 percent), the Johnstown-Altoona corridor (2.96 percent), then Washington, Philadelphia and Chicago before we hit a bunch of suburbs such as Mt. Lebanon, Bethel Park, Cranberry and Greensburg.

Not sure what this says about our base, especially the Philly component, but I’m all ears if you’ve got any theories.

Eric Hince: DK, you’ve reported re Josh Harrison that no one has found a ‘hole’ as a hitter, whereas you mention teams adjusting to take advantage of Gregory Polanco’s “big, looping” swing. What are the coaches doing, if anything, to help Polanco adjust to the adjustments?

DK: I don’t recall ever saying or writing that about Polanco, Eric. He does have a long swing — just check that follow-through up there in that pic I clicked yesterday — but unlike some recent Pirates with long swings such as Adam LaRoche and Travis Snider, he also has the uncanny ability to shorten it up as needed. I really don’t think this will be an issue for him, short or long term.

Polanco’s issues were much more about how he was adjusting to how he was pitched. Coincidence or not, he’s spent the early part of this spring almost obsessively swinging for the opposite field. Read into that what you want. I asked him, and he said, “Just normal.”

In general, I wouldn’t place Polanco in other people’s categories. The tool set is just too explosive. The hands, the wrists, now all that added upper-body strength.

He’s special.

anthony.panza: Will you be traveling with the Pens during their West Coast trip in early March?

DK: I will not, Anthony, but this is as good a place as any to share that — contrary to my previously cited schedule for this week — I’m planning to go to D.C. for Penguins-Capitals tomorrow night. Pretty big game, I’d say. Well worth the booking.

I’m looking into covering the Pirates on a western swing this summer, too.

Richard Stewart: DK, love the “good dude” comments you make in the Friday Insider! With all of the news stories over the past few years about athletes (and sometimes sports organizations) behaving badly, it is easy to forget that there are a lot of college and professional athletes that are great people and do outstanding things that nobody hears about. Thinking back over your career, who are the handful of athletes that stand out to you the most when it comes to “good dude” status?

DK: Hate to take the beaten path here, but no one — and I mean no one ever — gives of his time to more people and more great causes than Sidney Crosby.

You’ve seen videos and documentaries, you’ve read accounts, but until you’ve witnessed what I did a couple weeks ago, it might seem surreal: After the Penguins played a matinee at Consol, Crosby was told a group of young children from his birthplace Cole Harbour, Nova Scotia, were in the crowd. Minutes after the game and all his usual media duties — I honestly don’t recall if the Penguins won or lost, but it wouldn’t have mattered — he stood outside the team’s locker room and waited by a tunnel for the group to be brought down.

I asked why he was there, and he explained, then added with a broad smile, “This is going to be really cool. You should hang around. Wait till you see their faces.”

It was really cool.

Thanks to all for participating! Tremendous stuff, and a lot left behind, too, in the comments. Please don’t hesitate to shoot some of those back again next week.